OK, right out, let me say I’m not speak­ing on behalf of any­one here. But one aspect of Queer Up North has stirred a bee in my bonnet.

Last year, sev­eral people in the Manchester trans­gendered com­munity gave us grief because one of our artists had pre­vi­ously per­formed in a venue that does not allow trans­gendered people access. We had protests, we had all sorts of stuff going on.

That’s fine. I might not agree, but I respect com­pletely the fact that there are dif­fer­ent view­points here, and that pub­lic protest is a legit­im­ate way of express­ing opinion.

How­ever, for­ward to this year. QuN had two trans­gendered artists in lead­ing slots. It had Joanne Mey­erow­itz, one of the most emin­ent aca­dem­ics work­ing in the field of trans­gender stud­ies, lec­tur­ing on “A dif­fer­ent his­tory of gender.”

And what feed­back do we hear from the trans­gender com­munity this year? Noth­ing. Not a word.

This leads to an inter­est­ing ques­tion. Why?

My opin­ion is going to get me the hate mail. I think it’s because the trans­gender com­munity in Manchester (at least) is polit­ic­ally imma­ture. It’s being a group of cower­ing people in a huddle, point­ing at per­ceived threats and say­ing “look, you’re vic­tim­ising us!”

To my mind, a polit­ic­ally mature com­munity gives credit where it’s due. It engages with friends and enemies. It doesn’t make itself out to be the vic­tim. It’s bet­ter than that. I’m not see­ing that here.

Queer Up North didn’t put on such a trans-inclusive pro­gramme this year in order to provide bal­ance to last year. Token­ism is not what drives its pro­gram­ming. Not, I think, should shouts of “we’re being vic­tim­ised” drive the trans­gender polit­ical com­munity and its choice of fights.

 

7 Responses to Queer Up North and the transgendered community

  1. Sarah Brown says:

    Let me get this right — after demon­strat­ing to us that we’re less import­ant than giv­ing big­ots an artistic plat­form last year, you’re now lay­ing into us for not giv­ing you a stand­ing ova­tion for invit­ing per­formers who aren’t transphobes?

    You call us imma­ture, but I might sug­gest someone is hav­ing a little bit of a tem­per tan­trum here, and it’s not us.

    By the way, what’s “trans­gendered”? It sounds like some­thing one might get done at the vet.

  2. alan says:

    No, that’s not right. I’m inter­ested in, and ask­ing why, it’s not even been talked about, as far as google can tell me. No per­jor­at­ives, no super­lat­ives, just why.

    I pushed out one (delib­er­ately pro­voc­at­ive) thought as to why. Care to address it, rather than me?

  3. Grace says:

    To my mind, a polit­ic­ally mature com­munity gives credit where it’s due. It engages with friends and enemies.”

    I didn’t real­ize your org was an enemy of the trans com­munity. We’ll keep it in mind. Thanks for the warn­ing! :D

  4. admin says:

    Thanks for the smi­ley on that one — I almost read it as if you meant it!

  5. aney says:

    As someone that atten­ded the Joanne Mey­erow­itz lec­ture I don’t feel the need to heap praise on queer Up North after all they are fun­ded by the Arts Coun­cil who are fun­ded by the tax payer.….me . Did you attend the lec­ture?? it was very well atten­ded which is more than I could say for the other events which were in some cases only half full. This was prob­ably due to the woe­fully poor mar­ket­ing. I know a trans per­son that volun­teered to help , but per­haps next year she will not be avail­able. As for the fest­ival poster — all very nice pick­ing a min­im­al­ist design but was it eye-catching …I think not! The poster just DID NOT WORK

  6. admin says:

    Yup, I was there, in the front row. I thought it was fant­astic. Mar­ket­ing was dif­fi­cult this year because fin­ances didn’t come together until the very last minute — cor­por­ate spon­sor­ship was near-zero because of the eco­nomy, and we rely on that a lot.

    I agree with you about the poster — but I’m told as many people love it as dis­like it.